The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $search_thread - Line: 60 - File: showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.28 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code 60 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1617 eval




Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 1.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
original advertising
#25
(15-03-2018, 07:29 PM)Tony Betts Wrote: Hi chris,

Good to see the site being developed.

I did wonder if lack of "variation". was down to funding.

Most of there signs tend to advertise sales and services. Wich suggest they are showroom signs. But surely austin had as many outlets as morris.

It's strange there signage advertising, rearly included individual models as well, nothing with austin 7, 10, 12, 16, 20. On, just sales or service?

I would have though showrooms would have more advertising up. On individual models + prices.

Under morris, I have several individuals models and prices on advertising. Especially on cardboard.

Tony.
Hi Tony, 
The simple answer to your question would be that a vitreous enamel sign would be expected to be in place for a considerable number of years, hence simply 'Ausin Service' or 'Austin Dealer'. To advertise an individual Austin model, such as for example the 'Seven' would simply not have been cost effective as changes in their design every year or so would have given such signs only a very short life span.
Jim.

(15-03-2018, 04:57 PM)Tony Betts Wrote: Any sensible views on why there seams to be so little original austin advertising surviving.

There seams to be plenty of paperwork / catalogues. Pre-war and vintage.

But not much signage etc. Especially pre-war.

We're as there seams to be plenty of morris??

Thanks Tony.



Hi Tony,
What a fantastic couple of early signs. May I suggest that these date from the very early beginnings of the Austin Motor Company and would confidently date them as being around 1907/8.
Jim.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
original advertising - by Tony Betts - 15-03-2018, 04:57 PM
RE: original advertising - by Chris Garner - 15-03-2018, 06:35 PM
RE: original advertising - by Tony Betts - 15-03-2018, 07:29 PM
RE: original advertising - by James stringer - 24-03-2018, 09:34 AM
RE: original advertising - by Ian Williams - 15-03-2018, 08:24 PM
RE: original advertising - by Chris Garner - 15-03-2018, 09:15 PM
RE: original advertising - by Tony Betts - 15-03-2018, 09:57 PM
RE: original advertising - by Douglas Alderson - 15-03-2018, 11:58 PM
RE: original advertising - by Colin Reed - 16-03-2018, 12:49 AM
RE: original advertising - by James stringer - 24-03-2018, 12:14 AM
RE: original advertising - by Duncan Grimmond - 16-03-2018, 09:29 AM
RE: original advertising - by Mike Costigan - 16-03-2018, 09:52 AM
RE: original advertising - by Nick Salmon - 16-03-2018, 12:04 PM
RE: original advertising - by John Penny - 16-03-2018, 04:58 PM
RE: original advertising - by Tony Press - 19-03-2018, 01:47 AM
RE: original advertising - by Duncan Grimmond - 16-03-2018, 07:11 PM
RE: original advertising - by John Penny - 16-03-2018, 07:29 PM
RE: original advertising - by Tony Betts - 16-03-2018, 08:20 PM
RE: original advertising - by Douglas Alderson - 16-03-2018, 10:40 PM
RE: original advertising - by Tony Betts - 16-03-2018, 10:53 PM
RE: original advertising - by Viteran - 16-03-2018, 11:42 PM
RE: original advertising - by Lowespeed - 18-03-2018, 05:22 PM
RE: original advertising - by Douglas Alderson - 18-03-2018, 10:18 PM
RE: original advertising - by Tony Betts - 18-03-2018, 11:11 PM
RE: original advertising - by John Cornforth - 19-03-2018, 11:19 AM
RE: original advertising - by Chris Garner - 24-03-2018, 11:12 AM
RE: original advertising - by peter burton - 24-03-2018, 11:33 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)