The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $search_thread - Line: 60 - File: showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.28 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code 60 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1617 eval




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Richard Edmonds results?
#9
Hi Tony, surely it would not be cost effective to break a Chummy to make an Ulster Rep.10k for a car which will provide most of the incorrect running gear and a V5.
Surely better to convert spare parts which are still reasonably plentiful into complete cars.
Hedd,which way is the Hobby going?

Given that many 'ulster reps' are on long wheel base chassis, having a chassis of the correct length wouldn't seem so incorrect to me.

Its going from restoring pieces of history to making approximations of racing cars as toys under the 'historic' banner.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Richard Edmonds results? - by JonE - 05-11-2017, 09:11 AM
RE: Richard Edmonds results? - by Austin Carr - 05-11-2017, 05:20 PM
RE: Richard Edmonds results? - by JonE - 06-11-2017, 01:01 PM
RE: Richard Edmonds results? - by Tony Betts - 06-11-2017, 06:52 PM
RE: Richard Edmonds results? - by Zetomagneto - 06-11-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Richard Edmonds results? - by Hedd_Jones - 07-11-2017, 04:49 PM
RE: Richard Edmonds results? - by Hedd Jones - 06-11-2017, 10:47 PM
RE: Richard Edmonds results? - by Nick Salmon - 06-11-2017, 11:21 PM
RE: Richard Edmonds results? - by Mike Costigan - 07-11-2017, 10:15 AM
RE: Richard Edmonds results? - by Wesley - 07-11-2017, 08:36 PM
RE: Richard Edmonds results? - by JonE - 07-11-2017, 06:01 PM
RE: Richard Edmonds results? - by Erich - 09-11-2017, 05:37 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)