Hmmm.... you are not going to believe this. I transposed the wrong figure.
Your body number is acceptably close to the AD body range! (i.e. 1000 numerals in advance of the next chassis number down on the AD Register list... but 54,000 rather than 53,000, which I'd say is is statistically significant?)
Could you post a pic of the clear stamp so we can compare to the earlier one on the thread, Tony?
I think its thus a circular argument. Unless you have data posted, you can't work out what the potential patterns are? Especially now we are starting to be able to see the 'signature' of the different stamps... and understand how the cars or chassis were shipped.
I can see that it possibly makes the cars look unoriginal though... could you perhaps advise them privately so we can work on them?
Your body number is acceptably close to the AD body range! (i.e. 1000 numerals in advance of the next chassis number down on the AD Register list... but 54,000 rather than 53,000, which I'd say is is statistically significant?)
Could you post a pic of the clear stamp so we can compare to the earlier one on the thread, Tony?
(15-01-2020, 11:31 PM)Tony Press Wrote: Jon,
For Australian bodied cars we have never advised the 'body' number because they are so random as to be of little or no interest.
I think its thus a circular argument. Unless you have data posted, you can't work out what the potential patterns are? Especially now we are starting to be able to see the 'signature' of the different stamps... and understand how the cars or chassis were shipped.
I can see that it possibly makes the cars look unoriginal though... could you perhaps advise them privately so we can work on them?