The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $search_thread - Line: 60 - File: showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.28 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code 60 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1617 eval



Austinsevenfriends › Austin Seven Friends Forum › Forum chat... v
Type 65 static timing

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linear Mode
Type 65 static timing
Colin Wilks Offline
Senior Member
****
Joined: Nov 2017 Posts: 555 Threads: 54
Reputation: 7
Location: West Yorkshire
Car type: Type 65 1934 + RP 1932
#7
13-11-2017, 06:07 PM (This post was last modified: 13-11-2017, 08:42 PM by Colin Wilks. Edit Reason: Stop the shouty large text. Not sure how that happened. )
(13-11-2017, 03:22 PM)NickB Wrote: Colin, Chris Goulds Guide to the Austin 65 and Nippy suggests a compression ratio of 6.73 for the 65, (although this head may have been skimmed - his words).
If you haven't got a copy yet, you'll want one!
Nick

Hi Nick, along with the Woodrow manual, Chris Gould's guide was my first purchase - somehow page 21, "Original Specifications ..." had eluded me!
(13-11-2017, 04:42 PM)graham Wrote: The procedure for setting static timing will depend on whether you have a manual advance/retard or auto advance distributor. For manual advance, set the lever on steering wheel to fully advanced and proceed as others have suggested above. 
For auto advance the points should be set to open at TDC. "Standard" A7 engines will tolerate small timing errors and some tweaking on test runs may  improve performance.

Graham

Thanks Graham, as I said, I'm new to the manual timing on the steering wheel. I have to say your advice seems counter intuitive, in that I had imagined setting the car to idle at its static timing position and then manually advancing the timing from there to suit. Your proposal indicates I would only ever retard the timing from its static setting using the manual control, which I would think was unusual.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Type 65 static timing - by Colin Wilks - 13-11-2017, 12:12 PM
RE: Type 65 static timing - by Derek Sheldon - 13-11-2017, 01:05 PM
RE: Type 65 static timing - by Hedd_Jones - 13-11-2017, 01:32 PM
RE: Type 65 static timing - by Colin Wilks - 13-11-2017, 02:57 PM
RE: Type 65 static timing - by NickB - 13-11-2017, 03:22 PM
RE: Type 65 static timing - by Colin Wilks - 13-11-2017, 06:07 PM
RE: Type 65 static timing - by graham - 13-11-2017, 04:42 PM
RE: Type 65 static timing - by Bob Culver - 13-11-2017, 08:41 PM
RE: Type 65 static timing - by Colin Wilks - 13-11-2017, 09:11 PM
RE: Type 65 static timing - by Ian Williams - 13-11-2017, 09:23 PM
RE: Type 65 static timing - by Bob Culver - 15-11-2017, 04:19 AM
RE: Type 65 static timing - by Colin Wilks - 15-11-2017, 07:21 PM
RE: Type 65 static timing - by Bob Culver - 17-11-2017, 05:17 AM
RE: Type 65 static timing - by dickie65 - 23-12-2017, 02:01 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)