The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $search_thread - Line: 60 - File: showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.29 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code 60 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1617 eval




Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
H1 SU versus Ruby Zenith sidedraft
#15
There are two 1" SU types commonly available, the OM, which has a round air intake and no intake flange and the UBA, which has an intake flange suitable for an air filter. UBA's have a vertical mounting arrangement, so need an adapter to mount onto an A7 manifold. They were standard on late Morris Minor and early Morris 8 models but may have been fitted to other, less common vehicles.
OM's are more variable and some have a horizontal mounting and bolt directly onto an A7 manifold.
Fitting an SU to an early car is a bit of a challenge, requiring a special inlet manifold. I have a UBA on my mag engine Chummy, using a manifold fabricated from 28mm plumbing fittings! It just about allows the SU to fit in and close the bonnet. However, I have obtained a Derrington aluminium manifold, which gains about an inch over my creation. Sadly, it is cracked and probably only suitable as a pattern. I may see about getting some reproductions cast.........
Reply


Messages In This Thread
H1 SU versus Ruby Zenith sidedraft - by JonE - 17-05-2018, 09:28 AM
RE: H1 SU versus Ruby Zenith sidedraft - by JonE - 17-05-2018, 04:51 PM
RE: H1 SU versus Ruby Zenith sidedraft - by Alan - 17-05-2018, 04:42 PM
RE: H1 SU versus Ruby Zenith sidedraft - by JonE - 17-05-2018, 09:25 PM
RE: H1 SU versus Ruby Zenith sidedraft - by Parazine - 21-05-2018, 11:34 AM
RE: H1 SU versus Ruby Zenith sidedraft - by JonE - 21-05-2018, 12:45 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)