The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $search_thread - Line: 60 - File: showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.28 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code 60 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1617 eval




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
HC Head - is it worth the bother?
#9
The HC head overlaps part of the cylinder, so it's important that the pistons don't protrude above the top of the block at TDC, even when there is a bit of whip in a 2-bearing crankshaft. The thin gasket gives some clearance, 20 thou from memory.  I suggest you check that no-one in the past has shaved the top of the block or left out the base gasket.  One way to check "static" clearance is to trial-fit the head without a gasket and use small pieces of plasticine.  Once you have turned the engine over by hand, the squashed material can be checked for thickness in each cylinder.

I found that less advance was appropriate after changing from the LC to the HC head, presumably because the "squish" effect causes more turbulence.

The tradeoff for more power is a slightly harsher sounding engine, especially around 2200 RPM.  Things smooth out noticeably above 3000 RPM, which is my level cruising speed of about 45 in 4th gear. (1936 Pearl)

The 2-stud water branch can be fitted without a gasket if the faces are flat,  Loctite SI 5660 worked well for me.  I recommend 20 to 25 ft-lb as a torque figure for head nuts fitted dry (other opinions are available !).

John Cornforth
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: HC Head - is it worth the bother? - by John Cornforth - 26-09-2017, 05:13 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)