The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $search_thread - Line: 60 - File: showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.28 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code 60 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1617 eval




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Registration detail
#1
Hello
Some doubt about my Ruby’s number.
Is it possible for a registration number consisting of 3 letters followed by 3 numbers to be the original number of a 1936 car ?
Regards
           Tim
Reply
#2
(03-09-2018, 06:53 AM)Tiger Wrote: Hello
Some doubt about my Ruby’s number.
Is it possible for a registration number consisting of 3 letters followed by 3 numbers to be the original number of a 1936 car ?
Regards
           Tim

Hi Tim.

Yes, perfectly possible.

That configuration was progressively introduced from late 1933.  By 1936, some authorities had got up to E or F as the first of the three letters.

Three numbers followed by three letters would be wrong, as this layout was introduced from the mid-fifties and is the format for the inappropriately-named "age-related" plates currently being issued.

If you could let me know all of the letters, I can tell you the month of issue.

Martin.
Reply
#3
Tim,
Yes, mine is - (DKJ 851 - '36 Nippy).
Reply
#4
DKJ is a series issued by Kent County Council between June and October 1936; 851 will therefore be late September or early October.
Reply
#5
Spot on Mike!
Reply
#6
Many thanks for your replies Gents.
I feel a lot happier with the vehicle.
DGJ 852
She has been very badly treated before my ownership.
So needs a lot of fettling.
I have no idea of the engine condition and wonder what steps to take to test it?
Regards
Tim
PS engine is only loosely assembled.
I am mainly concerned with assessing the bottom end and I am reluctant to remove the engine.
Reply
#7
If it's "loosely assembled "I'd be very suspicious there is some thing wrong with it.
Reply
#8
(03-09-2018, 11:57 AM)Tiger Wrote: Many thanks for your replies Gents.
I feel a lot happier with the vehicle.
DGJ 852
She has been very badly treated before my ownership.
So needs a lot of fettling.
I have no idea of the engine condition and wonder what steps to take to test it?
Regards
          Tim
PS engine is only loosely assembled.
I am mainly concerned with assessing the bottom end and I am reluctant to remove the engine.


DGJ is a London registration, issued in August 1936

Do you have a V5 registration document?

If you're new to Austin Sevens, I'd strongly recommend joining a local club (see www.a7ca.org for a list). You'll find loads of help, advice and useful contacts.
Reply
#9
It's fairly easy to remove the sump from underneath and get at the big ends, and also centre main bearing, if you have a three bearing engine. This would perhaps afford you a rough idea of what you're up against. For any more meaningful inspection you'd really do better to take the engine out, it's not all that difficult.
Reply
#10
(03-09-2018, 11:57 AM)Tiger Wrote: Many thanks for your replies Gents.
I feel a lot happier with the vehicle.
DGJ 852
She has been very badly treated before my ownership.
So needs a lot of fettling.
I have no idea of the engine condition and wonder what steps to take to test it?
Regards
          Tim
PS engine is only loosely assembled.
I am mainly concerned with assessing the bottom end and I am reluctant to remove the engine.

Just further to my last reply, I see that your car is listed as SORN on the DVLA site and is also included on the A7CA register.  All numbers and dates look right.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)