04-04-2018, 04:47 PM
I think many people have missed the note of 'Editorial Team' in the text earlier. This wasn't a one man show, and still isn't.
I'm sure Les contributed heavily to it but it reads as if a group put it together and came up with the revisions that have all been so well received.
If the Association hierarchy have decided on this course of action then I would think we owe them the benefit of the doubt when it comes to an explanation. There is a meeting shortly I think? Perhaps all will be explained there.
Sometimes things just don't work out on committees, with the best will in the world on all sides. Please don't take this as a detraction from the work of the Editor or anyone else but without all the facts then we are just doing what the internet does best - filling a vacuum with our own ideas!
I'm sure Les contributed heavily to it but it reads as if a group put it together and came up with the revisions that have all been so well received.
If the Association hierarchy have decided on this course of action then I would think we owe them the benefit of the doubt when it comes to an explanation. There is a meeting shortly I think? Perhaps all will be explained there.
Sometimes things just don't work out on committees, with the best will in the world on all sides. Please don't take this as a detraction from the work of the Editor or anyone else but without all the facts then we are just doing what the internet does best - filling a vacuum with our own ideas!