The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $search_thread - Line: 60 - File: showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.28 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code 60 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1617 eval




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
28/29 rad shells compatibility
#7
(11-01-2018, 03:30 PM)Mike Costigan Wrote:
(11-01-2018, 11:00 AM)JonE Wrote: That's good to know the early shorter rad shell finishes when the magneto finishes... 

Well, almost! In fact the raised nickel-plated shells were introduced in August 1928 at A6-9330 (chassis 67024), the first coil engine was fitted to A7-1280 (68814, engine 69000) and not standardised until A7-1569 (69135). The RK (wide-door saloon style) was not standardised until A7-6400, so there were both mag-engined and coil-engined R saloons with the larger radiator.

Bill Sheehan has asked me to post this reply-

Jon - There is a difference between the 28/29 radiator shell and those fitted to Nippys, albeit not a lot.  The neck orifice is larger; the bottom front face does not have the two-bolts protruding (although there were a few Ulsters with the later no-bolt version); only one of the external holes on the shell lower sides agrees with the mounting holes on the earlier shells & it is not slotted; the steel reinforcing internal brackets are longer and the channels are shaped differently; the two mounting brackets for the tank base are entirely different.  Also you mentioned scanning factory drawings, but I feel you place too much reliance on their accuracy - they don't always agree with what metal the factory produces.  Re your striving for a  horizontal line - on bonnet drawings they may look level with the ground, but every Seven I've worked on had a rise of at least 1/4" from front to rear on the bonnets.  I've checked with 3 owners of 65/Nippys and they agree that theirs have a rise of 1/4".  A small difference such as that would hardly show on a small drawing.   Hope this helps.      Bill Sheehan
Reply


Messages In This Thread
28/29 rad shells compatibility - by JonE - 11-01-2018, 09:20 AM
RE: 28/29 rad shells compatibility - by JonE - 11-01-2018, 11:00 AM
RE: 28/29 rad shells compatibility - by Tony Press - 16-01-2018, 01:02 AM
RE: 28/29 rad shells compatibility - by JonE - 16-01-2018, 10:41 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)