The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.32 (Linux)
|
![]() |
Blown Ulster - Printable Version +- Austinsevenfriends (https://www.austinsevenfriends.co.uk/forum) +-- Forum: Austin Seven Friends Forum (https://www.austinsevenfriends.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Forum chat... (https://www.austinsevenfriends.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Thread: Blown Ulster (/showthread.php?tid=9882) |
RE: Blown Ulster - bystander - 07-03-2025 In the same auction is a 1934 Nippy, HE 6613, lot 64. Described as having had only one former owner RE: Blown Ulster - Mike Costigan - 08-03-2025 Low-number owner claims are always suspicious with our cars; if the original owner of the Nippy was seventeen in 1934 then he would be 108 now! Far more likely is one recorded owner since the DVLA records were digitalised - even that would be impressive. RE: Blown Ulster - Steve Jones - 08-03-2025 The Nippy rings a bell - maybe. HE reg is Barnsley, South Yorkshire and at the back of my mind I'm sure I remember a Barnsley registered Nippy still in Barnsley maybe 30 years or so ago. Can't remember much about it or the owner though. Maybe a coincidence. Steve RE: Blown Ulster - Colin Morgan - 08-03-2025 Nippy previously offered for sale here: https://classicmoto.rs/auto/austin-7-nippy-1934-7ZZjvW.html RE: Blown Ulster - ettore - 08-03-2025 (07-03-2025, 03:57 PM)Chris Garner Wrote:(04-03-2025, 04:03 PM)ettore Wrote: This is the problem... That’s great news - one customer here! This is an obvious gap and will be well received I have no doubt. Is the intent to have an up to date chassis registry within it, or is that a minefield too far? RE: Blown Ulster - bystander - 09-03-2025 Hampson's auction now underway - you can watch it live online! RE: Blown Ulster - Tony Griffiths - 09-03-2025 £21,000 - which might be about right for a replica that will need £3000+ in parts, plating, lights, etc to make it appear more original. RE: Blown Ulster - Steve Jones - 09-03-2025 Was £21,000 the hammer price or inclusive of fees, Tony? If the former, that's a very good price and I hope the purchaser is properly aware of what he/she's bought. Steve RE: Blown Ulster - bystander - 09-03-2025 Plus another £3000 or so for the buyers premium and VAT. Knocking on the door of £30k all in to end up with a half decent replica I reckon. Just the atrocious rear number plate and the dodgy registration would have been enough to keep me well away. The Nippy, on the other hand, looked a bargain at £7,000 (plus premium) RE: Blown Ulster - ettore - 10-03-2025 Probably about the right money with the mechanical specification. As others have said, some £ spent in making it look better/more authentic will still see it at the about the right level. Nippy looked a bargain. |