Austinsevenfriends
Calling Pork Pie Light experts - Printable Version

+- Austinsevenfriends (https://www.austinsevenfriends.co.uk/forum)
+-- Forum: Austin Seven Friends Forum (https://www.austinsevenfriends.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Forum chat... (https://www.austinsevenfriends.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Thread: Calling Pork Pie Light experts (/showthread.php?tid=6367)



Calling Pork Pie Light experts - Tony Griffiths - 12-07-2021

"Pork Pie" rear lights, Lucas Type ST138A.
The first image is an illuminated glass believed to have been fitted originally to a 1934 Ruby. It's marked on the inside of the rim, in small letters, "LUCAS P305" and is so dark that the lower section barely lets any light through. Its outside face is smooth, with just a single rib separating the lower rear light from the upper brake light section. Its inside has a "dimpled" texture.
The second image is of an illuminated glass also from an ST138A - but this is a very much lighter shade of red and marked across the bottom "ST38".
Modern reproductions have a different glass.
The question is - can anyone confirm that the darker, smooth-finish glass is indeed correct for 1934?


RE: Calling Pork Pie Light experts - dickie65 - 12-07-2021

They were fitted to 1933 EB65s too I have a very old tatty one somewhere. If I find it i will have a look.


RE: Calling Pork Pie Light experts - Bill Dixon - 12-07-2021

I have a 1934 RP saloon fitted with a ST 38 on the off side of the reg plate.


RE: Calling Pork Pie Light experts - Mike Costigan - 12-07-2021

This Ruby which I rescued many years ago (and passed on to Anne's cousin, Lou!) was, I believe, a 1934 car, and has/had a lens with external vertical ribbing (ST 135?)

   

However, the 1936 Ruby that I owned around the same time had the very dark lens with a smooth exterior and stippled inner face like your P305 illustration.

Your ST 135A would appear to be a third variant with internal horizontal ribbing!


RE: Calling Pork Pie Light experts - JonE - 12-07-2021

the original 65 one was smooth exterior, not ridged.


RE: Calling Pork Pie Light experts - Tony Griffiths - 12-07-2021

(12-07-2021, 07:05 PM)Mike Costigan Wrote: This Ruby which I rescued many years ago (and passed on to Anne's cousin, Lou!) was, I believe, a 1934 car, and has/had a lens with external vertical ribbing (ST 135?) However, the 1936 Ruby that I owned around the same time had the very dark lens with a smooth exterior and stippled inner face like your P305 illustration.
Your ST 135A would appear to be a third variant with internal horizontal ribbing!

So, it might just be that the one on our Ruby with the very dark lens and a smooth, external surface might be a replacement - as supplied on later cars.

(12-07-2021, 06:13 PM)dickie65 Wrote: They were fitted to 1933 EB65s too I have a very old tatty one somewhere. If I find it i will have a look.
Thanks, I'd be interested to know.

(12-07-2021, 06:40 PM)Bill Dixon Wrote: I have a 1934 RP saloon fitted with a ST 38  on the off side of the reg plate.
Is the glass smooth on the outside with no ribbing of any sort?


RE: Calling Pork Pie Light experts - Stuart Joseph - 13-07-2021

Good morning. I have checked my Lucas parts lists and it states: ST38A 'fitted with a slightly domed and fluted glass'.

Regards from the creative county - Staffordshire.


RE: Calling Pork Pie Light experts - Tony Griffiths - 13-07-2021

(13-07-2021, 10:05 AM)Stuart Joseph Wrote: Good morning. I have checked my Lucas parts lists and it states: ST38A 'fitted with a slightly domed and fluted glass'.

Regards from the creative county - Staffordshire.

Might the list mention the Type P305? This is the one we believe to be original to the car


RE: Calling Pork Pie Light experts - spannerman - 14-07-2021

Was it a wartime glass fitted to dim the rear light


RE: Calling Pork Pie Light experts - Tony Griffiths - 14-07-2021

(14-07-2021, 06:55 PM)spannerman Wrote: Was it a wartime glass fitted to dim the rear light
 A very interesting idea, though nothing in the regulations of the time suggests it would have happened: http://www.aj-wilkinson.co.uk/blackout.html  The aim of all the restrictions was to reduce the area of light visible.